The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-Live-1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash

GPT-Live-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

OpenAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-Live-1 and Ling 3.0 Flash trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-Live-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-Live-1

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
131,072

Individual benchmarks

2 reported for GPT-Live-1 · 19 for Ling 3.0 Flash

1 shared

GPT-Live-1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Tau3 Banking), while Ling 3.0 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-Live-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-Live-1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-Live-1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash does not.

GPT-Live-1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-Live-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-Live-1 was released on 2026-09-10, while Ling 3.0 Flash was released on 2026-08-04.

GPT-Live-1 is 1 month newer than Ling 3.0 Flash.

GPT-Live-1

Sep 10, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
Ling 3.0 Flash

Aug 4, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-Live-1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-07-31, while Ling 3.0 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-Live-1's training data extends to 2025-07-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash's cutoff date.

GPT-Live-1

Jul 2025

Ling 3.0 Flash

Provider Availability

GPT-Live-1 is available from OpenAI. Ling 3.0 Flash is available from DeepInfra.

GPT-Live-1

openai logo
OpenAI

Ling 3.0 Flash

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-Live-1 and Ling 3.0 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-Live-1
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-Live-1 vs Ling 3.0 Flash.

Which is better, GPT-Live-1 or Ling 3.0 Flash?

GPT-Live-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-Live-1 is made by OpenAI and Ling 3.0 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-Live-1 compare to Ling 3.0 Flash in benchmarks?

GPT-Live-1 scores TAU3-Bench: 86.2%, Tau3 Banking: 32.0%. Ling 3.0 Flash scores AIME 2026: 93.2%, Multi-IF: 87.7%, HMMT Feb 26: 87.0%, IMO-AnswerBench: 83.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 82.8%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-Live-1 and Ling 3.0 Flash?

GPT-Live-1 supports an unknown number of tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-Live-1 and Ling 3.0 Flash?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-Live-1 and Ling 3.0 Flash?

GPT-Live-1 is developed by OpenAI and Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.