The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-Live-1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

GPT-Live-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

OpenAI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-Live-1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-Live-1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-Live-1

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.43 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.87 / M
Context window
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

2 reported for GPT-Live-1 · 31 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro

1 shared

GPT-Live-1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (TAU3-Bench), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-Live-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-Live-1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-Live-1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.

GPT-Live-1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-Live-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-Live-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-Live-1

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-Live-1 was released on 2026-09-10, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27.

GPT-Live-1 is 5 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

GPT-Live-1

Sep 10, 2026

1 weeks ago

4mo newer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Apr 27, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-Live-1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-07-31, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-Live-1's training data extends to 2025-07-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.5-Pro's cutoff date.

GPT-Live-1

Jul 2025

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Provider Availability

GPT-Live-1 is available from OpenAI. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita.

GPT-Live-1

openai logo
OpenAI

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-Live-1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-Live-1
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-Live-1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Which is better, GPT-Live-1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GPT-Live-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-Live-1 is made by OpenAI and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-Live-1 compare to MiMo-V2.5-Pro in benchmarks?

GPT-Live-1 scores TAU3-Bench: 86.2%, Tau3 Banking: 32.0%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores FrontierSWE (Impl.): 100.0%, GSM8k: 99.6%, ARC-C: 97.2%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, C-Eval: 91.5%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-Live-1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GPT-Live-1 supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-Live-1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-Live-1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GPT-Live-1 is developed by OpenAI and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.