The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs LFM3-VL-2B

LFM3-VL-2B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.5 to -6.2.

IBM · Liquid AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM3-VL-2B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.5 to -6.2, ranking #265 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

Choose LFM3-VL-2B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.5 and ranks #265 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
LFM3-VL-2B
Liquid AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-6.2
#400
15.5
#265
Reasoning
-6.2
#391
16.2
#252
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
LFM3-VL-2B
Math
-5.9#342
19.0#187
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview · 41 for LFM3-VL-2B

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and LFM3-VL-2Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.1B diff

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview has 5.1B more parameters than LFM3-VL-2B, making it 264.6% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
1.9Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
1.9B
LFM3-VL-2B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

LFM3-VL-2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

LFM3-VL-2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LFM3-VL-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while LFM3-VL-2B uses LFM Open License v1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

LFM3-VL-2B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while LFM3-VL-2B was released on 2026-10-27.

LFM3-VL-2B is 18 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.5 years ago

LFM3-VL-2B

Oct 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and LFM3-VL-2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
LFM3-VL-2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs LFM3-VL-2B.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or LFM3-VL-2B?

LFM3-VL-2B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.5 to -6.2. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and LFM3-VL-2B is made by Liquid AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to LFM3-VL-2B in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. LFM3-VL-2B scores DocVQA: 96.7%, CountBench: 93.0%, ChartQA: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 90.5%, POPE: 88.7%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and LFM3-VL-2B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-6.2 vs 15.5), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs LFM Open License v1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and LFM3-VL-2B?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and LFM3-VL-2B is developed by Liquid AI.

Related comparisons