The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads the LLM Stats Score 4.8 to -5.4.

IBM · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 4.8 to -5.4, ranking #298 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 4.8 and ranks #298 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.4
#356
4.8
#298
Reasoning
-5.4
#346
5.4
#293
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Math
-5.8#317
8.8#256
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview · 7 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

1 shared

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is better at 1 benchmark (IFEval).

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.0B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has 1.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 14.3% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
8.0Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
8.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 was released on 2025-03-18.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 2 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.4 years ago

1mo newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Mar 18, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

—

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads the LLM Stats Score 4.8 to -5.4. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 scores MATH-500: 95.4%, MBPP: 84.6%, MT-Bench: 81.0%, IFEval: 79.3%, BFCL v2: 63.6%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.4 vs 4.8), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons