The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct are closely matched at -5.3 and -3.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -5.3 and -3.2.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.3
#347
-3.2
#333
Reasoning
-5.3
#336
-4.6
#330
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview · 9 for Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Phi-3.5-vision-instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.8B diff

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview has 2.8B more parameters than Phi-3.5-vision-instruct, making it 66.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
4.2Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
4.2B
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Phi-3.5-vision-instruct uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Phi-3.5-vision-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 8 months newer than Phi-3.5-vision-instruct.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.4 years ago

8mo newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -5.3 and -3.2. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to Phi-3.5-vision-instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Phi-3.5-vision-instruct scores ScienceQA: 91.3%, POPE: 86.1%, MMBench: 81.9%, ChartQA: 81.8%, AI2D: 78.1%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.3 vs -3.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons