The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 24.8 to -5.4.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.8 to -5.4, ranking #160 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.8 and ranks #160 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-5.4
#356
24.8
#160
-5.4
#346
22.6
#168
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.49 / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
-5.8#317
23.8#123
-3.7#207
25.9#54
-3.7#192
27.0#29
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview · 50 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

2 shared

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (IFEval, MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

229.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has 229.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 3271.4% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
236.0Bparameters
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
236.0B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 5 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 24.8 to -5.4. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 97.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, MMLU-Redux: 92.2%, OCRBench: 92.0%, MMBench-V1.1: 89.9%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.4 vs 24.8), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.