The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 6.9.

IBM · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 6.9, ranking #157 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #157 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.0
#157
6.9
#277
21.8
#166
3.5
#285
7.9
#125
-2.8
#163
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
25.5#103
3.5#278
14.0#50
0.8#104
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 30B · 32 for Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

21.7B diff

IBM Granite 4.2 30B has 21.7B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 261.9% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 19 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.6yr newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 30B or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 6.9. IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 30B compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 6.9), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 30B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.