The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.3 to 15.6.

IBM · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.3 to 15.6, ranking #14 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.3 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
IBM
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
15.6
#213
50.3
#14
Reasoning
12.0
#234
50.7
#10
Coding
-6.7
#247
35.5
#25
Agents
2.0
#152
35.2
#16
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
— / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Muse Spark 1.1
Tool use
5.3#144
32.4#8
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 11 for Muse Spark 1.1

No common benchmarks found

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark 1.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Muse Spark 1.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 2 months newer than Muse Spark 1.1.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1mo newer
Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.3 to 15.6. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Muse Spark 1.1?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.6 vs 50.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Muse Spark 1.1?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons