IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.6 to 15.0.
IBM · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.6 to 15.0, ranking #146 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B
- you want predictable pricing at $0.03/M input and $0.12/M output
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- overall performance matters — it scores 29.6 and ranks #146 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SciCode).
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has 71.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 2366.7% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only IBM Granite 4.2 3B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only IBM Granite 4.2 3B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
License
Usage and distribution terms
IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 2 months newer than IBM Granite 4.2 3B.
Aug 25, 2026
1 months ago
Oct 15, 2026
5 days ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 3B's cutoff date.
—
May 2026
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).
Related comparisons
More IBM Granite 4.2 3B comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Mercury 3
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Beam 1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Muse Spark Open