The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus are closely matched at 15.0 and 14.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

IBM · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.0 and 14.5.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.0
#256
14.5
#257
11.3
#275
14.9
#251
-7.9
#287
5.5
#218
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$0.03 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
13.3#239
18.2#194
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 3B · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

3 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 3B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

11.0B diff

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has 11.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 366.7% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only IBM Granite 4.2 3B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only IBM Granite 4.2 3B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 16 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

1 months ago

1.3yr newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 3B's cutoff date.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

—

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 3B vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 3B or Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 15.0 and 14.5. IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 3B compare to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports 131K tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.0 vs 14.5), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 3B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft.