The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-1.5V vs Grok-4

Grok-4 leads the LLM Stats Score 33.7 to -0.8.

xAI · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-4 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 33.7 to -0.8, ranking #98 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-1.5V

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

Choose Grok-4

  • overall performance matters — it scores 33.7 and ranks #98 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.8
#332
33.7
#98
-0.1
#319
32.9
#101
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Grok-1.5V
Grok-4
-1.7#187
18.6#77
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Grok-1.5V · 7 for Grok-4

No common benchmarks found

Grok-1.5V and Grok-4don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok-4 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Grok-4 specifies output context (8,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok-1.5V
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok-4
Input256,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok-1.5V and Grok-4 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok-1.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-1.5V

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-1.5V was released on 2024-04-12, while Grok-4 was released on 2025-07-09.

Grok-4 is 15 months newer than Grok-1.5V.

Grok-1.5V

Apr 12, 2024

2.4 years ago

Grok-4

Jul 9, 2025

1.2 years ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Grok-1.5V's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-1.5V's cutoff date.

Grok-1.5V

Grok-4

Dec 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-1.5V and Grok-4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-1.5V
✓ Preferred
Grok-4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-1.5V vs Grok-4.

Which is better, Grok-1.5V or Grok-4?

Grok-4 leads the LLM Stats Score 33.7 to -0.8. Grok-1.5V is made by xAI and Grok-4 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok-1.5V compare to Grok-4 in benchmarks?

Grok-1.5V scores AI2D: 88.3%, DocVQA: 85.6%, TextVQA: 78.1%, ChartQA: 76.1%, RealWorldQA: 68.7%. Grok-4 scores AIME 2025: 91.7%, HMMT25: 90.0%, GPQA: 87.5%, LiveCodeBench: 79.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 40.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-1.5V and Grok-4?

Grok-1.5V supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok-4 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-1.5V and Grok-4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.8 vs 33.7). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.