The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok-2 Image 1212 vs Parse

Comparing Grok-2 Image 1212 and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

xAI · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-2 Image 1212 and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Grok-2 Image 1212 also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok-2 Image 1212

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window

Choose Parse

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok-2 Image 1212
xAI
Parse
Cohere
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
8,192

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for Grok-2 Image 1212 · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

Grok-2 Image 1212 and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok-2 Image 1212 accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens.

xAI
Grok-2 Image 1212
Input131,072 tokens
Output- tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Parse supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok-2 Image 1212 does not.

Parse can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok-2 Image 1212

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok-2 Image 1212

Proprietary

Closed source

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok-2 Image 1212 was released on 2024-12-12, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Parse is 21 months newer than Grok-2 Image 1212.

Grok-2 Image 1212

Dec 12, 2024

1.8 years ago

Parse

Aug 27, 2026

3 weeks ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Grok-2 Image 1212 is available from xAI. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.

Grok-2 Image 1212

xai logo
xAI

Parse

azure logo
Azure
cohere logo
Cohere
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok-2 Image 1212 and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok-2 Image 1212
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok-2 Image 1212 vs Parse.

Which is better, Grok-2 Image 1212 or Parse?

Grok-2 Image 1212 (xAI) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Grok-2 Image 1212 compare to Parse in benchmarks?

Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok-2 Image 1212 and Parse?

Grok-2 Image 1212 supports 131K tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok-2 Image 1212 and Parse?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 8K), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok-2 Image 1212 and Parse?

Grok-2 Image 1212 is developed by xAI and Parse is developed by Cohere.

Related comparisons