Grok-3 Mini vs Muse Glimmer-30B
Grok-3 Mini and Muse Glimmer-30B are closely matched at 31.3 and 34.9 on the LLM Stats Score. Grok-3 Mini is 1.5x cheaper per token.
xAI · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Grok-3 Mini and Muse Glimmer-30B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 31.3 and 34.9.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-3 Mini wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Grok-3 Mini is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Glimmer-30B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Grok-3 Mini
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token
Choose Muse Glimmer-30B
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
4 reported for Grok-3 Mini · 25 for Muse Glimmer-30B
Grok-3 Mini outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Muse Glimmer-30B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Grok-3 Mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok-3 Mini ($0.30/1M tokens) costs the same as Muse Glimmer-30B ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok-3 Mini ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.4x cheaper than Muse Glimmer-30B ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Muse Glimmer-30B is more expensive than Grok-3 Mini.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Glimmer-30B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to Grok-3 Mini's 128,000 tokens. Muse Glimmer-30B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Grok-3 Mini is limited to 8,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Grok-3 Mini and Muse Glimmer-30B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Grok-3 Mini
Muse Glimmer-30B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok-3 Mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Muse Glimmer-30B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok-3 Mini was released on 2025-02-17, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.
Muse Glimmer-30B is 18 months newer than Grok-3 Mini.
Feb 17, 2025
1.6 years ago
Aug 10, 2026
1 months ago
1.5yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-3 Mini has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Muse Glimmer-30B has a cutoff of 2026-01-04.
Muse Glimmer-30B has more recent training data (up to 2026-01-04), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Grok-3 Mini (2024-11-17).
Nov 2024
Jan 2026
1.2 yr newerProvider Availability
Grok-3 Mini is available from xAI. Muse Glimmer-30B is available from DeepInfra.
Grok-3 Mini
Muse Glimmer-30B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Grok-3 Mini and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Grok-3 Mini vs Muse Glimmer-30B.