The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Glimmer-30B

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 35.0.

Xiaomi · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 35.0, ranking #57 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
40.6
#57
35.0
#93
34.1
#35
22.3
#84
29.9
#38
16.6
#81
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
131,072

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 25 for Muse Glimmer-30B

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Glimmer-30Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

990.4B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 990.4B more parameters than Muse Glimmer-30B, making it 3345.9% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
29.6Bparameters
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
29.6B
Muse Glimmer-30B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Muse Glimmer-30B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Glimmer-30B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Muse Glimmer-30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 1 month newer than Muse Glimmer-30B.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1mo newer
Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Glimmer-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
Muse Glimmer-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Glimmer-30B.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Muse Glimmer-30B?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 35.0. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Muse Glimmer-30B is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to Muse Glimmer-30B in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%. Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, GPQA: 83.5%, AA-LCR: 80.0%, CharXiv-R: 78.8%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Glimmer-30B?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.6 vs 35.0), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Glimmer-30B?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta.