The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched at 48.5 and 43.0 on the LLM Stats Score. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 33.3x cheaper per token.

xAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 48.5 and 43.0.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 33.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok 4.7 also accepts a larger context window (500,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.7

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 500,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • cost matters — it's about 33.3x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok 4.7
xAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.5
#22
43.0
#46
Reasoning
37.4
#68
44.1
#36
Agents
36.3
#18
29.1
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
500,000
262,144

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for Grok 4.7 · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Grok 4.7 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok 4.7 ($6.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok 4.7 is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok 4.7
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerxAI
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok 4.7 accepts 500,000 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.7
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok 4.7 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Grok 4.7 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Grok 4.7 is 1 month newer than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Grok 4.7

Sep 21, 2026

0 days ago

2w newer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.7 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.7's training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date.

Grok 4.7

May 2026

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

—

Provider Availability

Grok 4.7 is available from xAI. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Grok 4.7

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.7
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Grok 4.7 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 48.5 and 43.0. Grok 4.7 is made by xAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4.7 compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Grok 4.7 scores BixBench MCQ: 88.4%, WMDP-Bio: 88.1%, WMDP-Cyber: 88.1%, WMDP-Chem: 84.9%, CyberGym: 80.3%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is Grok 4.7 cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 33.3x cheaper for input tokens. Grok 4.7 costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output via xai. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 43.0), context window (500K vs 262K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.7 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons