Grok 4.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Grok 4.7 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 26.8. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is 18.3x cheaper per token.
xAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Grok 4.7 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 26.8, ranking #23 overall.
On price, Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is roughly 18.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Grok 4.7 also accepts a larger context window (500,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Grok 4.7
- overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #23 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 500,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
- cost matters — it's about 18.3x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
23 reported for Grok 4.7 · 23 for Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Grok 4.7 and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Grok 4.7 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 23.5x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) ($0.09/1M tokens).
For output processing, Grok 4.7 ($6.00/1M tokens) is 15.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) ($0.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok 4.7 is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Grok 4.7 accepts 500,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Only Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Grok 4.7 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) does not.
Grok 4.7 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Grok 4.7
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
License
Usage and distribution terms
Grok 4.7 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) was released on 2026-03-11.
Grok 4.7 is 6 months newer than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).
Sep 21, 2026
0 days ago
6mo newerMar 11, 2026
6 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok 4.7 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) has a cutoff of 2025-06-01.
Grok 4.7 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) (2025-06-01).
Jun 2026
1 yr newerJun 2025
Provider Availability
Grok 4.7 is available from xAI. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.
Grok 4.7
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Grok 4.7 and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Grok 4.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).