MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 26.8. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is 3.3x cheaper per token.
Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 26.8, ranking #19 overall.
On price, Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is roughly 3.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- overall performance matters — it scores 49.8 and ranks #19 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
- cost matters — it's about 3.3x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
18 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 23 for Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens) is 5.1x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) ($0.09/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens) is 2.2x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) ($0.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiMo-V2.6-Pro is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 900.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B), making it 750.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Only Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) does not.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) was released on 2026-03-11.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 7 months newer than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).
Sep 22, 2026
0 days ago
6mo newerMar 11, 2026
6 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)'s training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.
—
Jun 2025
Provider Availability
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is available from Xiaomi. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).