The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok Code Fast 1 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Comparing Grok Code Fast 1 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

xAI · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok Code Fast 1 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok Code Fast 1

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $1.50/M output

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.20 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
256,000
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Grok Code Fast 1 · 14 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Grok Code Fast 1 and MiniMax M3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

For input processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Grok Code Fast 1 ($1.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok Code Fast 1 is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerxAI
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerMiniMax
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiniMax M3.1 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Grok Code Fast 1's 256,000 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 is limited to 10,000 tokens.

xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input256,000 tokens
Output10,000 tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok Code Fast 1 does not.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Grok Code Fast 1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Grok Code Fast 1

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 14 months newer than Grok Code Fast 1.

Grok Code Fast 1

Aug 28, 2025

1.1 years ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

0 days ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Grok Code Fast 1 is available from xAI. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax.

Grok Code Fast 1

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok Code Fast 1 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok Code Fast 1
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok Code Fast 1 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Grok Code Fast 1 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI) and MiniMax M3.1 Flash (MiniMax) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Grok Code Fast 1 compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Grok Code Fast 1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 70.8%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

Is Grok Code Fast 1 cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.20/M input and $1.50/M output via xai. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via minimax.

What are the context window sizes for Grok Code Fast 1 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256K tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok Code Fast 1 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include context window (256K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok Code Fast 1 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Grok Code Fast 1 is developed by xAI and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.