The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to 43.1.

Tencent · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.6 to 43.1, ranking #16 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Flash wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy3

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.6 and ranks #16 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
43.1
#38
49.6
#16
43.1
#37
49.2
#16
33.4
#29
36.6
#20
26.7
#39
35.5
#14
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 5
5 of 5
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.47 / M
Context window
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Hy3
Qwen3.8 Flash
36.3#38
32.6#55
22.9#42
31.6#10
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Hy3 · 22 for Qwen3.8 Flash

5 shared

Hy3 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Flash is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, NL2Repo, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, Toolathlon).

Qwen3.8 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

170.0B diff

Hy3 has 170.0B more parameters than Qwen3.8 Flash, making it 136.0% larger.

Tencent
Hy3
295.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
125.0Bparameters
295.0B
Hy3
125.0B
Qwen3.8 Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Tencent
Hy3
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy3 does not.

Qwen3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Hy3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Hy3 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.8 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06, while Qwen3.8 Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8 Flash is 2 months newer than Hy3.

Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

1 months ago

Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

5 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy3 and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy3
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash.

Which is better, Hy3 or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to 43.1. Hy3 is made by Tencent and Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy3 compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%. Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Hy3 and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Hy3 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Hy3 and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.1 vs 49.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy3 and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Hy3 is developed by Tencent and Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.