The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are closely matched at 50.8 and 40.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

Tencent · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 50.8 and 40.6.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy4 preview

  • you are already invested in the Tencent ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
50.8
#15
40.6
#57
39.3
#15
34.1
#35
36.5
#16
29.9
#38
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

32 reported for Hy4 preview · 3 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

1 shared

Hy4 preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro is better at 1 benchmark (Program Bench).

MiMo-V2.6-Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

250.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 250.0B more parameters than Hy4 preview, making it 32.5% larger.

Tencent
Hy4 preview
770.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
770.0B
Hy4 preview
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy4 preview does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Hy4 preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Hy4 preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 1 month newer than Hy4 preview.

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

3 weeks ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy4 preview
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Hy4 preview or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 50.8 and 40.6. Hy4 preview is made by Tencent and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy4 preview compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%.

What are the main differences between Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.8 vs 40.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.