The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy4 preview vs MiniMax M3

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 41.4.

Tencent · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 41.4, ranking #14 overall.

In the 9 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy4 preview wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy4 preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.1 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 9 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose MiniMax M3

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Hy4 preview
Tencent
MiniMax M3
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.1
#14
41.4
#49
Reasoning
50.7
#11
41.4
#45
Coding
39.8
#12
32.2
#37
Agents
36.3
#14
25.8
#45
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
8 of 9
1 of 9
Input price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
—
512,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Hy4 preview
MiniMax M3
Math
39.4#17
25.4#105
Tool use
31.1#10
21.1#53
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

32 reported for Hy4 preview · 35 for MiniMax M3

9 shared

Hy4 preview outperforms in 8 benchmarks (APEX-Agents, BankerToolBench, DRACO, MCP Atlas, NL2Repo, OfficeQA Pro, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while MiniMax M3 is better at 1 benchmark (PostTrainBench).

Hy4 preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

342.0B diff

Hy4 preview has 342.0B more parameters than MiniMax M3, making it 79.9% larger.

Tencent
Hy4 preview
770.0Bparameters
MiniMax
MiniMax M3
428.0Bparameters
770.0B
Hy4 preview
428.0B
MiniMax M3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3 specifies input context (512,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Tencent
Hy4 preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3
Input512,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiniMax M3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy4 preview does not.

MiniMax M3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Hy4 preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Hy4 preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiniMax M3 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MiniMax M3

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28, while MiniMax M3 was released on 2026-06-01.

Hy4 preview is 3 months newer than MiniMax M3.

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer
MiniMax M3

Jun 1, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy4 preview
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy4 preview vs MiniMax M3.

Which is better, Hy4 preview or MiniMax M3?

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 41.4. Hy4 preview is made by Tencent and MiniMax M3 is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy4 preview compare to MiniMax M3 in benchmarks?

Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%. MiniMax M3 scores OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.6%, SpreadSheetBench-v1: 89.3%, USAMO 2026: 85.7%, Video-MME: 85.4%, VideoMMMU: 84.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3?

Hy4 preview supports an unknown number of tokens and MiniMax M3 supports 512K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.1 vs 41.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy4 preview and MiniMax M3?

Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent and MiniMax M3 is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons