The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M3 vs Parse

Comparing MiniMax M3 and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

MiniMax · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3 and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

MiniMax M3 also accepts a larger context window (512,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 512,000 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Parse

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
512,000
8,192

Individual benchmarks

35 reported for MiniMax M3 · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

MiniMax M3 and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

425.7B diff

MiniMax M3 has 425.7B more parameters than Parse, making it 18508.7% larger.

MiniMax
MiniMax M3
428.0Bparameters
Cohere
Parse
2.3Bparameters
428.0B
MiniMax M3
2.3B
Parse

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiniMax M3 accepts 512,000 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens. Only MiniMax M3 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M3
Input512,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiniMax M3 and Parse support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiniMax M3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M3 is licensed under MIT, while Parse uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M3

MIT

Open weights

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M3 was released on 2026-06-01, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Parse is 3 months newer than MiniMax M3.

MiniMax M3

Jun 1, 2026

3 months ago

Parse

Aug 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiniMax M3 is available from Fireworks, MiniMax, Novita, Together. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.

MiniMax M3

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Parse

azure logo
Azure
cohere logo
Cohere
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3 and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M3
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M3 vs Parse.

Which is better, MiniMax M3 or Parse?

MiniMax M3 (MiniMax) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does MiniMax M3 compare to Parse in benchmarks?

MiniMax M3 scores OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.6%, SpreadSheetBench-v1: 89.3%, USAMO 2026: 85.7%, Video-MME: 85.4%, VideoMMMU: 84.6%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M3 and Parse?

MiniMax M3 supports 512K tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M3 and Parse?

Key differences include context window (512K vs 8K), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M3 and Parse?

MiniMax M3 is developed by MiniMax and Parse is developed by Cohere.