The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hy4 preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 21.0.

Tencent · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hy4 preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 21.0, ranking #14 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hy4 preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hy4 preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.05/M input and $0.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Hy4 preview
Tencent
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#14
21.0
#190
Reasoning
50.8
#10
19.7
#195
Coding
39.7
#14
0.6
#238
Agents
36.7
#16
-6.7
#182
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.05 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Hy4 preview
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Math
41.0#11
22.3#140
Tool use
30.9#14
-1.9#183
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

32 reported for Hy4 preview · 15 for Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

1 shared

Hy4 preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Hy4 preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

738.0B diff

Hy4 preview has 738.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B), making it 2306.3% larger.

Tencent
Hy4 preview
770.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
32.0Bparameters
770.0B
Hy4 preview
32.0B
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Tencent
Hy4 preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Hy4 preview is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Hy4 preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hy4 preview was released on 2026-08-28, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

Hy4 preview is 9 months newer than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Hy4 preview

Aug 28, 2026

3 weeks ago

8mo newer
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while Hy4 preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Hy4 preview's cutoff date.

Hy4 preview

—

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hy4 preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hy4 preview
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hy4 preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Which is better, Hy4 preview or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Hy4 preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 21.0. Hy4 preview is made by Tencent and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hy4 preview compare to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) in benchmarks?

Hy4 preview scores GPQA: 92.3%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 85.4%, WideSearch: 83.9%, MCP Atlas: 83.7%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 82.9%. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Hy4 preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Hy4 preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Hy4 preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 21.0), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hy4 preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Hy4 preview is developed by Tencent and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons