The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 21.0. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 1.0x cheaper per token.

InclusionAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 21.0, ranking #41 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.2 and ranks #41 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.2
#41
21.0
#189
Reasoning
44.6
#33
19.7
#194
Agents
29.5
#36
-6.7
#181
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.06 / M
$0.05 / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
262,144
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Tool use
20.4#57
-1.9#182
Finance
36.7#5
14.0#130
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 15 for Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs less

For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.05/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input tokens$0.05
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

92.0B diff

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has 92.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B), making it 287.5% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
124.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
32.0Bparameters
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
32.0B
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 262,144 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 262,144 tokens.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 9 months newer than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

1 weeks ago

8mo newer
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

—

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

Provider Availability

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.2 to 21.0. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compare to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin cheaper than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is 1.2x cheaper for input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) costs $0.05/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.2 vs 21.0), input pricing ($0.06 vs $0.05/M), licensing (Unknown vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons