The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Comparing Kimi K2.8 Preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Moonshot AI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K2.8 Preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Kimi K2.8 Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K2.8 Preview

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.05 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for Kimi K2.8 Preview · 15 for Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

No common benchmarks found

Kimi K2.8 Preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K2.8 Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s 262,144 tokens. Only Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.8 Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi K2.8 Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) does not.

Kimi K2.8 Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2.8 Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2.8 Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) was released on 2025-12-15.

Kimi K2.8 Preview is 9 months newer than Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Sep 11, 2026

3 days ago

9mo newer
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Dec 15, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-11-28, while Kimi K2.8 Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)'s training data extends to 2025-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi K2.8 Preview's cutoff date.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

Nov 2025

Provider Availability

Kimi K2.8 Preview is available from Moonshot AI. Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is available from DeepInfra.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K2.8 Preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K2.8 Preview
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B).

Which is better, Kimi K2.8 Preview or Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Kimi K2.8 Preview (Moonshot AI) and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) (NVIDIA) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Kimi K2.8 Preview compare to Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) in benchmarks?

Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) scores AIME 2025: 99.2%, WMT24++: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, GPQA: 75.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 68.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K2.8 Preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Kimi K2.8 Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K2.8 Preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K2.8 Preview and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)?

Kimi K2.8 Preview is developed by Moonshot AI and Nemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B) is developed by NVIDIA.