The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi-k1.5 vs QwQ-32B

Kimi-k1.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Moonshot AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi-k1.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (IFEval, MATH-500), while QwQ-32B is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2024). Kimi-k1.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Jan 2025
Mar 2025
License
Proprietary
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Kimi-k1.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (IFEval, MATH-500), while QwQ-32B is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2024).

Kimi-k1.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Kimi-k1.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi-k1.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

QwQ-32B is 1 month newer than Kimi-k1.5.

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Kimi-k1.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi-k1.5's cutoff date.

Kimi-k1.5

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi-k1.5 and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi-k1.5
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi-k1.5 vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Kimi-k1.5 or QwQ-32B?

Kimi-k1.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Kimi-k1.5 compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the main differences between Kimi-k1.5 and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi-k1.5 and QwQ-32B?

Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.