The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K2 0905 vs MiniCPM-SALA

Kimi K2 0905 leads the LLM Stats Score 22.0 to 12.7.

Moonshot AI · OpenBMB · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K2 0905 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 22.0 to 12.7, ranking #166 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiniCPM-SALA wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K2 0905

  • overall performance matters — it scores 22.0 and ranks #166 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes

Choose MiniCPM-SALA

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
22.0
#166
12.7
#230
22.3
#158
14.2
#214
19.5
#92
21.1
#80
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.50 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Kimi K2 0905
MiniCPM-SALA
24.6#106
14.3#207
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Kimi K2 0905 · 24 for MiniCPM-SALA

3 shared

Kimi K2 0905 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while MiniCPM-SALA is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, HumanEval).

MiniCPM-SALA shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

990.5B diff

Kimi K2 0905 has 990.5B more parameters than MiniCPM-SALA, making it 10451.6% larger.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
1.0Tparameters
OpenBMB
MiniCPM-SALA
9.5Bparameters
1000.0B
Kimi K2 0905
9.5B
MiniCPM-SALA

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Kimi K2 0905 specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Kimi K2 0905 specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
OpenBMB
MiniCPM-SALA
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2 0905 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniCPM-SALA uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2 0905

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniCPM-SALA

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2 0905 was released on 2025-09-05, while MiniCPM-SALA was released on 2026-02-11.

MiniCPM-SALA is 5 months newer than Kimi K2 0905.

Kimi K2 0905

Sep 5, 2025

11 months ago

MiniCPM-SALA

Feb 11, 2026

6 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K2 0905 and MiniCPM-SALA side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K2 0905
✓ Preferred
MiniCPM-SALA
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2 0905 vs MiniCPM-SALA.

Which is better, Kimi K2 0905 or MiniCPM-SALA?

Kimi K2 0905 leads the LLM Stats Score 22.0 to 12.7. Kimi K2 0905 is made by Moonshot AI and MiniCPM-SALA is made by OpenBMB. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Kimi K2 0905 compare to MiniCPM-SALA in benchmarks?

Kimi K2 0905 scores HumanEval: 94.5%, MMLU: 90.2%, MATH: 89.1%, MMLU-Pro: 82.5%, GPQA: 75.8%. MiniCPM-SALA scores HumanEval: 95.1%, RULER 64k: 92.7%, RULER 128k: 89.4%, MBPP: 89.1%, RULER 512K: 87.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K2 0905 and MiniCPM-SALA?

Kimi K2 0905 supports 262K tokens and MiniCPM-SALA supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K2 0905 and MiniCPM-SALA?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (22.0 vs 12.7), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K2 0905 and MiniCPM-SALA?

Kimi K2 0905 is developed by Moonshot AI and MiniCPM-SALA is developed by OpenBMB.