The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched at 39.4 and 43.0 on the LLM Stats Score. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 15.1x cheaper per token.

Moonshot AI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 39.4 and 43.0.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 15.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K2.7 Code

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 15.1x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
39.4
#59
43.0
#44
Reasoning
34.3
#89
44.2
#35
Agents
27.0
#46
29.2
#37
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.68 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$3.40 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
262,144
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Kimi K2.7 Code
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Tool use
24.0#40
20.4#58
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Kimi K2.7 Code · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Kimi K2.7 Code ($0.68/1M tokens) is 11.3x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K2.7 Code ($3.40/1M tokens) is 18.9x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K2.7 Code is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code
Input tokens$0.68
Output tokens$3.40
Best providerDeepinfra
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

876.0B diff

Kimi K2.7 Code has 876.0B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, making it 706.5% larger.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code
1.0Tparameters
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
124.0Bparameters
1000.0B
Kimi K2.7 Code
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 262,144 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 262,144 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi K2.7 Code supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Kimi K2.7 Code can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K2.7 Code

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2.7 Code was released on 2026-06-12, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3 months newer than Kimi K2.7 Code.

Kimi K2.7 Code

Jun 12, 2026

3 months ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K2.7 Code is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Moonshot AI, Novita, Together. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Kimi K2.7 Code

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.68/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.40/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K2.7 Code
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Kimi K2.7 Code or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 39.4 and 43.0. Kimi K2.7 Code is made by Moonshot AI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Kimi K2.7 Code compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores MCP-Mark: 81.1%, MCP Atlas: 76.0%, LiveBench: 71.9%, Kimi Code Bench v2: 62.0%, Program Bench: 53.6%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is Kimi K2.7 Code cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 11.3x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.68/M input and $3.40/M output via deepinfra. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Kimi K2.7 Code supports 262K tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (39.4 vs 43.0), input pricing ($0.68 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Modified MIT License vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K2.7 Code and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Kimi K2.7 Code is developed by Moonshot AI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons