The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 51.3. Kimi K3.1 Pro is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Moonshot AI · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 51.3, ranking #5 overall.

In the 15 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 11; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Kimi K3.1 Pro is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K3

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.5 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 11 of 15 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
51.3
#16
55.5
#5
50.4
#12
54.3
#6
40.7
#14
42.7
#9
37.6
#20
41.6
#5
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 15
11 of 15
Input price
$2.85 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$14.25 / M
$10.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Kimi K3
Kimi K3.1 Pro
41.5#11
38.6#26
35.9#14
40.5#4
31.3#9
30.4#14
36.6#9
40.8#2
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Kimi K3 · 30 for Kimi K3.1 Pro

15 shared

Kimi K3 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, Humanity's Last Exam, PostTrainBench, ZEROBench), while Kimi K3.1 Pro is better at 11 benchmarks (APEX-Agents, BabyVision, BrowseComp, DeepSWE, GPQA, Kimi Code Bench v2, MMMU-Pro, MMMU-Pro (with tools), OfficeQA Pro, PerceptionBench, SWE-Marathon).

Kimi K3.1 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Oct 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro costs less

For input processing, Kimi K3 ($2.85/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K3 ($14.25/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Kimi K3.1 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K3 is more expensive than Kimi K3.1 Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 29 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input tokens$2.85
Output tokens$14.25
Best providerDeepinfra
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 1,048,576 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Thu Oct 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16, while Kimi K3.1 Pro was released on 2026-10-23.

Kimi K3.1 Pro is 3 months newer than Kimi K3.

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

3 months ago

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Oct 23, 2026

3 days ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K3 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Moonshot AI, Novita, Together. Kimi K3.1 Pro is available from Moonshot AI.

Kimi K3

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $2.85/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.25/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Kimi K3.1 Pro

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K3
✓ Preferred
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro.

Which is better, Kimi K3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 51.3. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI and Kimi K3.1 Pro is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Kimi K3 compare to Kimi K3.1 Pro in benchmarks?

Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%. Kimi K3.1 Pro scores BabyVision: 95.4%, GPQA: 94.2%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 92.7%, BrowseComp: 92.1%, Chartography: 90.2%.

Is Kimi K3 cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K3 costs $2.85/M input and $14.25/M output via deepinfra. Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via moonshot.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.3 vs 55.5), input pricing ($2.85 vs $2.00/M), licensing (Kimi K3 License vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.