Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 7.3. Llama 4 Scout is 29.6x cheaper per token.
Moonshot AI · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 7.3, ranking #5 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Llama 4 Scout is roughly 29.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Llama 4 Scout also accepts a larger context window (10,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro
- overall performance matters — it scores 55.5 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Llama 4 Scout
- cost matters — it's about 29.6x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 10,000,000 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
30 reported for Kimi K3.1 Pro · 12 for Llama 4 Scout
Kimi K3.1 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 0 benchmarks.
Kimi K3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).
For output processing, Kimi K3.1 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Kimi K3.1 Pro is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Kimi K3.1 Pro's 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while Kimi K3.1 Pro is limited to 1,048,576 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Kimi K3.1 Pro and Llama 4 Scout support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Llama 4 Scout
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Kimi K3.1 Pro was released on 2026-10-23, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.
Kimi K3.1 Pro is 19 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.
Oct 23, 2026
6 days ago
1.6yr newerApr 5, 2025
1.6 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Kimi K3.1 Pro is available from Moonshot AI. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Llama 4 Scout
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Kimi K3.1 Pro and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout.