Llama 4 Scout vs Particle-1
Particle-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 31.9 to 7.3. Llama 4 Scout is 3.2x cheaper per token.
Meta · Particle AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Particle-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 31.9 to 7.3, ranking #133 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Particle-1 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Llama 4 Scout is roughly 3.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Llama 4 Scout also accepts a larger context window (10,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 4 Scout
- cost matters — it's about 3.2x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 10,000,000 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Particle-1
- overall performance matters — it scores 31.9 and ranks #133 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
12 reported for Llama 4 Scout · 3 for Particle-1
Llama 4 Scout outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Particle-1 is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU).
Particle-1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens) is 3.1x cheaper than Particle-1 ($0.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens) is 3.3x cheaper than Particle-1 ($1.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Particle-1 is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Particle-1's 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while Particle-1 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Llama 4 Scout and Particle-1 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Llama 4 Scout
Particle-1
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 4 Scout is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Particle-1 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 4 Community License Agreement
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05, while Particle-1 was released on 2026-10-28.
Particle-1 is 19 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.
Apr 5, 2025
1.6 years ago
Oct 28, 2026
-1 days ago
1.6yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together. Particle-1 is available from Particle AI.
Llama 4 Scout
Particle-1
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Scout and Particle-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 4 Scout vs Particle-1.