The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nova Pro

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 11.8. Nova Pro is 2.9x cheaper per token.

Moonshot AI · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 11.8, ranking #5 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nova Pro is roughly 2.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Kimi K3.1 Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.5 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Nova Pro

  • cost matters — it's about 2.9x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
55.5
#5
11.8
#288
54.3
#6
11.5
#284
42.7
#9
10.0
#195
41.6
#5
10.2
#149
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.80 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$3.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
300,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Nova Pro
38.6#26
18.8#189
40.5#4
5.5#177
40.8#2
8.2#148
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

30 reported for Kimi K3.1 Pro · 27 for Nova Pro

1 shared

Kimi K3.1 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Nova Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Kimi K3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Pro costs less

For input processing, Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K3.1 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 3.1x more expensive than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K3.1 Pro is more expensive than Nova Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K3.1 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nova Pro's 300,000 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Nova Pro is limited to 300,000 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Kimi K3.1 Pro and Nova Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K3.1 Pro was released on 2026-10-23, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Kimi K3.1 Pro is 23 months newer than Nova Pro.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Oct 23, 2026

3 days ago

1.9yr newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K3.1 Pro is available from Moonshot AI. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K3.1 Pro and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K3.1 Pro
✓ Preferred
Nova Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nova Pro.

Which is better, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Nova Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 11.8. Kimi K3.1 Pro is made by Moonshot AI and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Kimi K3.1 Pro compare to Nova Pro in benchmarks?

Kimi K3.1 Pro scores BabyVision: 95.4%, GPQA: 94.2%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 92.7%, BrowseComp: 92.1%, Chartography: 90.2%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.

Is Kimi K3.1 Pro cheaper than Nova Pro?

Nova Pro is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via moonshot. Nova Pro costs $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Nova Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K3.1 Pro and Nova Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.5 vs 11.8), context window (1.0M vs 300K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.80/M), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K3.1 Pro and Nova Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro is developed by Moonshot AI and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.