Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 36.3. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 10.3x cheaper per token.
InclusionAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 36.3, ranking #44 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 10.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- overall performance matters — it scores 43.0 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 10.3x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 26 for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Finance Agent v2), while Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is better at 0 benchmarks.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 8.3x cheaper than Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) ($0.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 12.2x cheaper than Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) ($2.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has 426.0B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, making it 343.5% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 262,144 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 262,144 tokens.
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) was released on 2026-06-04.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3 months newer than Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B).
Sep 3, 2026
2 weeks ago
3mo newerJun 4, 2026
3 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-09-30, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)'s training data extends to 2025-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date.
—
Sep 2025
Provider Availability
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is available from DeepInfra.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B).