Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base
Comparing Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
InclusionAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 0 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Basedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has 44.0B more parameters than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base, making it 55.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base was released on 2025-09-10.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 12 months newer than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base.
Sep 3, 2026
2 weeks ago
11mo newerSep 10, 2025
1.0 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Base.