The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Ling 3.0 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 35.9 to 29.6.

InclusionAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.9 to 29.6, ranking #100 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.0 Flash wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 35.9 and ranks #100 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.0 Flash
InclusionAI
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.9
#100
29.6
#146
Reasoning
35.2
#99
28.9
#146
Coding
24.4
#90
14.4
#154
Agents
19.0
#88
11.9
#127
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
5 of 5
0 of 5
Input price
$0.06 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Ling 3.0 Flash
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Math
29.7#88
23.4#140
Tool use
16.3#96
5.4#169
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

5 shared

Ling 3.0 Flash outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AA-LCR, BrowseComp, MCP Atlas, Tau3 Banking, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Ling 3.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

50.0B diff

Ling 3.0 Flash has 50.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 67.6% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash
124.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
74.0Bparameters
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash
74.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ling 3.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash was released on 2026-08-04, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 2 months newer than Ling 3.0 Flash.

Ling 3.0 Flash

Aug 4, 2026

2 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while Ling 3.0 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash's cutoff date.

Ling 3.0 Flash

—

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Ling 3.0 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 35.9 to 29.6. Ling 3.0 Flash is made by InclusionAI and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash compare to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash scores AIME 2026: 93.2%, Multi-IF: 87.7%, HMMT Feb 26: 87.0%, IMO-AnswerBench: 83.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 82.8%. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Ling 3.0 Flash supports 131K tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.9 vs 29.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons