The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs o3

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.9 to 31.0.

InclusionAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.9 to 31.0, ranking #14 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.1 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.9 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose o3

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
50.9
#14
31.0
#126
47.4
#26
30.7
#129
39.3
#16
14.8
#142
38.2
#11
4.0
#170
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$8.00 / M
Context window
—
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ling 3.1 Flash
o3
28.9#14
10.7#128
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 22 for o3

1 shared

Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Multi-Challenge), while o3 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Ling 3.1 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o3 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o3 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

o3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

o3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while o3 was released on 2025-04-16.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 18 months newer than o3.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.5yr newer
o3

Apr 16, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

o3

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and o3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
o3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs o3.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or o3?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.9 to 31.0. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and o3 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to o3 in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.1 Flash and o3?

Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens and o3 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and o3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.9 vs 31.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and o3?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and o3 is developed by OpenAI.