The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash are closely matched at 51.0 and 37.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

InclusionAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 51.0 and 37.8.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
37.8
#79
Reasoning
47.5
#26
32.2
#117
Agents
38.0
#12
21.0
#73
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 5 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 Omni Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Qwen3.8 Omni Flash was released on 2026-09-18.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 0 month newer than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1w newer
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Sep 18, 2026

2 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 51.0 and 37.8. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to Qwen3.8 Omni Flash in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash scores VoiceBench Avg: 91.6%, DailyOmni: 85.1%, MMAU: 81.8%, OmniGAIA: 74.0%, WildClawBench: 71.0%.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 37.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons