Model Comparison

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3BWhich is better in 2026?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Qwen3 30B A3B is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B — which is better?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct (by Meta) and Qwen3 30B A3B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BFCL), while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3 30B A3B is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Llama 3.1 70B Instruct if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $0.20/M output

Choose Qwen3 30B A3B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BFCL), while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B costs less

For input processing, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerLambda
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

39.5B diff

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has 39.5B more parameters than Qwen3 30B A3B, making it 129.5% larger.

Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
70.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
30.5Bparameters
70.0B
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
30.5B
Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 9 months newer than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

1.9 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.1 years ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Groq, Cerebras, Together, Fireworks, Bedrock, Sambanova. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.59/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.78/1M
cerebras logo
Cerebras
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive output tokens
Higher BFCL score (84.8% vs 69.1%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Higher GPQA score (65.8% vs 41.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is made by Meta and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Llama 3.1 70B Instruct compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct scores GSM-8K (CoT): 95.1%, ARC-C: 94.8%, API-Bank: 90.0%, IFEval: 87.5%, Multilingual MGSM (CoT): 86.9%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.20/M output via lambda. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.20 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is developed by Meta and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.