The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Nova Pro

Nova Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 12.3 to 0.4.

NVIDIA · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nova Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 12.3 to 0.4, ranking #250 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nova Pro wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Nova Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 12.3 and ranks #250 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
0.4
#322
12.3
#250
0.1
#315
12.1
#245
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.80 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.20 / M
Context window
300,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Nova Pro
7.0#265
18.9#172
6.2#162
17.3#106
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct · 27 for Nova Pro

3 shared

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Pro is better at 3 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, MMLU).

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Pro specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Pro specifies output context (300,000 tokens).

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not.

Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Nova Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Nova Pro is 2 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.9 years ago

Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.8 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Nova Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nova Pro's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Nova Pro

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Nova Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Nova Pro.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct or Nova Pro?

Nova Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 12.3 to 0.4. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct compare to Nova Pro in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Nova Pro?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Nova Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (0.4 vs 12.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Nova Pro?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.