Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nova Pro
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 12.3. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 15.6x cheaper per token.
InclusionAI · Amazon · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 12.3, ranking #39 overall.
On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 15.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Nova Pro also accepts a larger context window (300,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- overall performance matters — it scores 43.3 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 15.6x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Nova Pro
- you process long inputs — it offers a 300,000 token context window
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 27 for Nova Pro
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 13.3x cheaper than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).
For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 17.8x cheaper than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Nova Pro is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Nova Pro accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is limited to 262,144 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.
Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Nova Pro
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 22 months newer than Nova Pro.
Sep 3, 2026
5 days ago
1.8yr newerNov 20, 2024
1.8 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Nova Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nova Pro.