The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nova Pro

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 12.3. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 15.6x cheaper per token.

InclusionAI · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 12.3, ranking #39 overall.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 15.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Nova Pro also accepts a larger context window (300,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.3 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 15.6x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nova Pro

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 300,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
43.3
#39
12.3
#250
44.7
#32
12.1
#245
29.5
#35
10.2
#116
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.06 / M
$0.80 / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
$3.20 / M
Context window
262,144
300,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Nova Pro
36.7#5
17.3#106
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 27 for Nova Pro

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 13.3x cheaper than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 17.8x cheaper than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Nova Pro is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nova Pro accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is limited to 262,144 tokens.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Wed Sep 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 22 months newer than Nova Pro.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

5 days ago

1.8yr newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
✓ Preferred
Nova Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nova Pro.

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Nova Pro?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 12.3. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compare to Nova Pro in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin cheaper than Nova Pro?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 13.3x cheaper for input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. Nova Pro costs $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Pro?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.3 vs 12.3), context window (262K vs 300K), input pricing ($0.06 vs $0.80/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nova Pro?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.