Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to -1.6.
Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.9 to -1.6, ranking #142 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
- you want predictable pricing at $0.05/M input and $0.05/M output
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- overall performance matters — it scores 29.9 and ranks #142 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has 63.4B more parameters than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct, making it 598.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 3.2 Community License
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 25 months newer than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.
Sep 25, 2024
2.1 years ago
Oct 15, 2026
4 days ago
2.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a cutoff of 2026-05-01.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has more recent training data (up to 2026-05-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct (2023-12-31).
Dec 2023
May 2026
2.4 yr newerOutputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).
Related comparisons
More Llama 3.2 11B Instruct comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Muse Spark Open
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Muse Wonder