Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Muse Spark Open
Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to -1.6. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 40.0x cheaper per token.
Meta · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Muse Spark Open leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.9 to -1.6, ranking #43 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark Open wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is roughly 40.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Spark Open also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 40.0x cheaper per token
Choose Muse Spark Open
- overall performance matters — it scores 44.9 and ranks #43 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct · 17 for Muse Spark Open
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark Open is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Muse Spark Open significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens) is 25.0x cheaper than Muse Spark Open ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens) is 85.0x cheaper than Muse Spark Open ($4.25/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Muse Spark Open is more expensive than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Muse Spark Open has 805.4B more parameters than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct, making it 7598.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Spark Open accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Muse Spark Open can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Muse Spark Open support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Muse Spark Open
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License, while Muse Spark Open uses Muse Model License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 3.2 Community License
Open weights
Muse Model License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15.
Muse Spark Open is 25 months newer than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.
Sep 25, 2024
2.1 years ago
Oct 15, 2026
4 days ago
2.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Muse Spark Open's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark Open's cutoff date.
Dec 2023
—
Provider Availability
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Sambanova, Bedrock, Groq, Together, Fireworks. Muse Spark Open is available from Together.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Muse Spark Open
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Muse Spark Open side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Muse Spark Open.
Related comparisons
More Llama 3.2 11B Instruct comparisons
- Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
- Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Muse Wonder