Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 22.1 to -1.6.
Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 22.1 to -1.6, ranking #202 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
- you want predictable pricing at $0.05/M input and $0.05/M output
Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- overall performance matters — it scores 22.1 and ranks #202 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has 6.6B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 165.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 11B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 3.2 Community License
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 25 months newer than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.
Sep 25, 2024
2.1 years ago
Oct 16, 2026
3 days ago
2.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date.
Dec 2023
—
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).
Related comparisons
More Llama 3.2 11B Instruct comparisons
More Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) comparisons
- Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs Muse Spark Open
- Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
- Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) vs Muse Wonder