The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 22.1 to 13.5.

Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 22.1 to 13.5, ranking #202 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 22.1 and ranks #202 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
13.5
#266
22.1
#202
Reasoning
11.4
#275
19.8
#213
Coding
9.2
#194
2.9
#241
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
17.5#202
12.2#245
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

1 shared

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

66.0B diff

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has 66.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 1650.0% larger.

Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
70.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
70.0B
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct was released on 2024-12-06, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 23 months newer than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Dec 6, 2024

1.9 years ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

4 days ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 22.1 to 13.5. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is made by Meta and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.3 70B Instruct compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores IFEval: 92.1%, MGSM: 91.1%, HumanEval: 88.4%, MBPP EvalPlus: 87.6%, MMLU: 86.0%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct supports 131K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.5 vs 22.1), licensing (Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is developed by Meta and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons