The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 7.8. Llama 4 Scout is 59.3x cheaper per token.

Meta · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 7.8, ranking #29 overall.

On price, Llama 4 Scout is roughly 59.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Llama 4 Scout also accepts a larger context window (10,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • cost matters — it's about 59.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 10,000,000 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Llama 4 Scout
Meta
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
7.8
#299
47.9
#29
Reasoning
6.6
#302
33.1
#108
Coding
0.3
#255
38.9
#18
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.08 / M
$4.00 / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
$20.00 / M
Context window
10,000,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Llama 4 Scout
Muse Wonder
Vision
9.8#136
25.4#53
Multimodal
12.9#115
25.4#52
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Llama 4 Scout · 16 for Muse Wonder

No common benchmarks found

Llama 4 Scout and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens) is 50.0x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens) is 66.7x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Muse Wonder's 1,048,576 tokens. Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Llama 4 Scout and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Scout is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Muse Wonder uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 19 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

-1 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together. Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API.

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M

Muse Wonder

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Scout and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 4 Scout
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Scout vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 7.8. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 4 Scout compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Muse Wonder?

Llama 4 Scout is 50.0x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra. Muse Wonder costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Scout and Muse Wonder?

Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens and Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Scout and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.8 vs 47.9), context window (10.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.08 vs $4.00/M), licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons