Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.6 to 7.3.
Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.6 to 7.3, ranking #146 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 4 Scout
- you want predictable pricing at $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- overall performance matters — it scores 29.6 and ranks #146 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
12 reported for Llama 4 Scout · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Llama 4 Scout outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Llama 4 Scout has 35.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 47.3% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Llama 4 Scout and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Llama 4 Scout
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 4 Scout is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 4 Community License Agreement
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 19 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.
Apr 5, 2025
1.5 years ago
Oct 15, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.5yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date.
—
May 2026
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Scout and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).
Related comparisons
More Llama 4 Scout comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Mercury 3
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Beam 1.0
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) vs Muse Spark Open