The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LongCat-Flash-Lite vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

LongCat-Flash-Lite and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched at 18.3 and 22.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Meituan · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LongCat-Flash-Lite and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 18.3 and 22.1.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LongCat-Flash-Lite

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LongCat-Flash-Lite
Meituan
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
18.3
#234
22.1
#202
Reasoning
18.6
#227
19.8
#213
Coding
6.7
#207
2.9
#241
Agents
3.9
#180
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
LongCat-Flash-Lite
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
17.2#206
12.2#245
Tool use
9.5#150
-2.1#205
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for LongCat-Flash-Lite · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

2 shared

LongCat-Flash-Lite outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified).

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

64.5B diff

LongCat-Flash-Lite has 64.5B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 1612.5% larger.

Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite
68.5Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
68.5B
LongCat-Flash-Lite
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only LongCat-Flash-Lite specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only LongCat-Flash-Lite specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite
Input256,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

LongCat-Flash-Lite is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LongCat-Flash-Lite

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LongCat-Flash-Lite was released on 2026-02-05, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 8 months newer than LongCat-Flash-Lite.

LongCat-Flash-Lite

Feb 5, 2026

8 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

1 days ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LongCat-Flash-Lite and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LongCat-Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LongCat-Flash-Lite vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, LongCat-Flash-Lite or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

LongCat-Flash-Lite and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 18.3 and 22.1. LongCat-Flash-Lite is made by Meituan and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LongCat-Flash-Lite compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

LongCat-Flash-Lite scores MATH-500: 96.8%, MMLU: 85.5%, CMMLU: 82.5%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, Tau2 Retail: 73.1%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for LongCat-Flash-Lite and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

LongCat-Flash-Lite supports 256K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LongCat-Flash-Lite and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (18.3 vs 22.1), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LongCat-Flash-Lite and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

LongCat-Flash-Lite is developed by Meituan and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons