The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Magistral Medium vs Muse Wonder Full

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 13.1.

Mistral AI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder Full leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 13.1, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Magistral Medium

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.1 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
13.1
#263
52.1
#13
Reasoning
13.3
#254
38.4
#71
Coding
3.4
#230
41.5
#8
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Magistral Medium · 16 for Muse Wonder Full

No common benchmarks found

Magistral Medium and Muse Wonder Fulldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Magistral Medium and Muse Wonder Full support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Magistral Medium is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Wonder Full uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10, while Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder Full is 16 months newer than Magistral Medium.

Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

1.3 years ago

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

1 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Medium has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Magistral Medium's training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date.

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

Muse Wonder Full

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Magistral Medium and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Magistral Medium
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Magistral Medium vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, Magistral Medium or Muse Wonder Full?

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 13.1. Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI and Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Magistral Medium compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the main differences between Magistral Medium and Muse Wonder Full?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.1 vs 52.1), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Magistral Medium and Muse Wonder Full?

Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI and Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons