The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MedGemma 4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -4.5.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -4.5, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MedGemma 4B IT

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MedGemma 4B IT
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-4.5
#352
45.7
#29
Reasoning
-5.0
#348
43.2
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for MedGemma 4B IT · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

MedGemma 4B IT and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

304.7B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 304.7B more parameters than MedGemma 4B IT, making it 7086.0% larger.

Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MedGemma 4B IT and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MedGemma 4B IT is licensed under Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 16 months newer than MedGemma 4B IT.

MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MedGemma 4B IT and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MedGemma 4B IT
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MedGemma 4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, MedGemma 4B IT or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -4.5. MedGemma 4B IT is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MedGemma 4B IT compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the main differences between MedGemma 4B IT and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.5 vs 45.7), licensing (Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MedGemma 4B IT and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons