Model Comparison

MedGemma 4B IT vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7BWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: MedGemma 4B IT vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B — which is better?

MedGemma 4B IT (by Google) and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose MedGemma 4B IT if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B if…

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen2.5-Omni-7Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.7B diff

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has 2.7B more parameters than MedGemma 4B IT, making it 62.8% larger.

Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MedGemma 4B IT is licensed under Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

MedGemma 4B IT is 2 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.1 years ago

1mo newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

FAQ

Common questions about MedGemma 4B IT vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, MedGemma 4B IT or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

MedGemma 4B IT (Google) and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does MedGemma 4B IT compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the main differences between MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include licensing (Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MedGemma 4B IT and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons